Easy Braid Stencil Rolls

March 25, 2009

eb41m1855-2tStencil Rolls

Production Automation is now offering Easy braid Stencil Rolls on our website, they can be found here:

Easy Braid Stencil Rolls at PAC

We are also offering Stencil Wipes from Easy Braid in three sizes: 4″x4″, 9″x9″, and 12″x12″

 

Easy Braid stencil rolls are designed for use in SMT (surface mount technology) screen printing lines. Rolls designed for SMT printing keep stencil apertures clear of paste residues during the automatic screen printing process. They also clean the bottom of stencils, keeping them free from paste and flux between prints. This is critical in applications that include small component devices with fine lead pitch.

Easy Braid high quality stencil rolls result in less down time, less change-over time, and less inventory. Wiping with high quality rolls prevents smearing, bridging, solder balls, and other problems associated with the stencil printing of solder paste.

Easy Braid stencil rolls are cost-efficient, because the number of spoiled circuit boards is minimized. Their high tear resistance raises mean time between failures and reduces operator intervention, which results in production that is more efficient.


Air Showers – Are They Worth It?

March 24, 2009

A Discussion about Air Showers, from Liberty Industries “Air Shower Newsletter”

Do they really reduce contamination?

The efficacy of air showers in the contamination control process has been a source of debate for several years.

Tests have been conducted which prove the effectiveness of air showers. The tests do show that an air shower does reduce particulate. For the most part, reduction in particulate matter is dependent upon the particle size, the type of garment worn, the cycle time, and directly relates to the air shower design and how it is used and maintained.

Does the use of an air shower justify its cost?

As a percentage of the total cost of the modern cleanroom, the cost of an air shower is virtually insignificant. In any application where contamination is critically important- such as life science, biomedical, pharmaceutical, parenteral drug, microelectronics, aerospace, and precision manufacturing- air showers should be considered essential equipment.

If its use could eliminate contamination of one expensive batch of pharmaceutical chemicals or the rejection of one semiconductor wafer, for example, it is m0ney well spent. Perhaps millions of dollars could be saved.

In addition, from a psychological point of view, having operating personnel pass through an air shower before entering the work area, reinforces the fact that cleanliness to the operation is essential. This, hopefully, reinforces the concept that protection of the product from personnel is a significant concern.

A brief history of the emergence of contamination control technology:

In today’s modern world of manufacturing and research, and development, contamination control has become a necessary of the manufacturing process. In fact, without it, many of the advances made in the last twenty years or so would not have been possible.

Contamination control technology is not confined to any one industry. Its practice transcends specific industries and is used, to some degree, in just about all manufacturing and research and development processes.

Without contamination control technology, the developing broad field of life sciences encompassing biotech, biomedical, pharmaceutical, parenteral drug, microelectronics, aerospace, and precision manufacturing would not have been able to achieve some of the discoveries that have been made to date nor the discoveries yet to be made. While nanotechnology, a new emerging field of study in which its research is done at the at the atomic or molecular level, could not exist without the advancements made in contamination control technology over the years.

Dealing with the issues of contamination control on a microscopic or smaller scale has lead to the creation of the modern cleanroom and along with it, the air shower.

The primary focus of a cleanroom is to control the levels of contamination by creating a differential pressure between the cleanroom and the surrounding area and to filter the air entering the room to prevent the entry of unwanted particulate matter and to change the air in the room with an air-handling system to purge particulate matter created within the room. The cleanroom itself is constructed of materials that tend to resist particulate generation, hence minimizing additional contamination. More sophisticated cleanrooms can also control temperature and humidity in the workspace.

In the conventional cleanroom, low velocity air enters from the ceiling plenum through perforated diffusers and carries out contamination through wall exhausts close to floor level. In the laminar flow cleanroom, air is introduced uniformly at low velocities into a space confined on four sides and through an opening equal to the cross sectional area of the confined space- a technique that stratifies the air and minimizes cross-stream contamination.

To keep this particulate matter from being recycled, both types of rooms use HEPA (High Efficiency Particulate Air) Filters. HEPA Filters are manufactured from glass fiber, accordion-style pleated filters that can be up to 99.99% efficient in removing particles .03 microns and larger. For more stringent requirements , an ULPA (Ultra Low Particulate Air) Filter may be used. An ULPA filter has the ability to remove a higher percentage of 0.3 micron particles than a HEPA filter.

Contamination vs. Particulate Matter: 

So far in this discussion the terms “particulate matter” and “contamination” have been used interchangeably.

A contaminate is any foreign substance that will have a detrimental effect on whatever you are trying to accomplish. This most significant form of contamination in cleanrooms is submicroscopic matter that are distributed in the air in the form of fine particles or fibers or carried into the cleanroom and redeposited by workers.

To be technically correct, however, it should be pointed out that not all particulate matter is a contaminate. To be considered a contaminate, a particulate matter must meet three criteria:

  1. It must be able to migrate to the vulnerable area, either by air currents, by fluids, or through transference from personnel
  2. It must be significant in number
  3. It must have physical properties that cause damage

Sources of Contamination:

Just about all industrial activities produce contaminates. Operating personnel present the most significant source contaminates – hair, skin, dandruff, as well as nasal and oral emissions- to name a few. While contaminates can and do differ in terms of hardness, size, shape, translucency, color, ect. their size in most cases, determines the degree of potential harm they can cause.

There is a very delicate balance between the contamination level, the number of personnel in a cleanroom and how they go about performing their assigned tasks. Some contamination is inevitable. In reality, there is very little you can do about this natural propensity to create contaminates except to instruct workers in correct cleanroom procedure and to deal with the unavoidable contamination as it arises. This is what cleanrooms have always done. You can certainly help matters by limiting the amount of contaminates that any specific individual brings in from the outside.

An air shower can be an integral part of the contamination control process because it can minimize the amount of contaminates brought into the cleanroom from the outside:

An air shower is nothing more than a device meant to limit the contamination brought into a controlled area such as a cleanroom. It works by moving air over the worker at a specific high velocity for a specified period of time. In a properly designed air shower, particles are driven off and away from the body and deposited on the upstream side of the HEPA or ULPA filters.

Air showers have been used effectively in the cleanroom industry for over thirty-five years and have been instrumental in reducing the level of contamination brought into the cleanroom.

Normally positioned between the cleanroom and the outside environment, an air shower is a chamber equipped with a blower unit, interlocking doors, HEPA filters and prefilters, a recirculating air system and multiple air nozzles. Various size nozzles are arranged on the walls and ceiling in a predetermined pattern for the most effective removal of loose particles, dust, or other particulate matter from the garments.

Filtered air is blown through the nozzles directly against the individual standing within the air shower, creating a flapping and shearing effect designed to remove loose contaminates prior to entering a change room, wash room, ante-room, or cleanroom. The air is sucked and taken from the chamber, stripped of its contaminates through the filtration system, and recycled back to the air shower to continue the cleaning job.

Today’s air shower is equipped with a powerful blower unit, solid state electrical control panels complete with safety monitors and and emergency shut down capabilities that may be activated from both the interior and exterior of the unit. Fluorescent lighting flush ceiling mounted for maximum brightness.

Is there a difference between Air Showers and an Air Lock? 

An air shower is usually built into an air lock. It is important to remember that there is a big difference between the two.

An air lock is a room, corridor or some other space which separates the cleanroom from a less clean area. Generally, it has two doors at opposite ends and is frequently designed with an electrical or mechanical interlock so that one door cannot be opened unless the other one is closed. Its purpose is to prevent the loss of valuable cleanroom air whenever a person leaves or enters the room and also to prevent contaminated air from entering the cleanroom when a door is opened. It also has the ability to conserve energy.

While an air shower can function in this capacity, it also has the additional advantage of being able to actively clean off contamination from the person entering the cleanroom with jets of filtered air coming out of the nozzles.

How does an Air Shower work?

Typically an air shower can be operated in three distinctly different ways depending on process requirements:

  1. One Way
  2. Two Way, One Way
  3. Two Way

One Way Operation:

  • Exit door locked at rest, entrance door unlocked. When the user enters the air shower, the entrance door closes and locks; then the air shower cycle starts.
  • At the end of the cycle, the entrance door stays locked and the exit door unlocks so that the user can leave.
  • When the exit door is closed, it locks again and the entrance door unlocks.
  • The air shower is now ready for use again.

Two Way, One Way Operation:

  • The air shower is used in both directions, but operates the air shower in only one direction.
  • Only one door at a time can be opened.
  • Both doors are unlocked at rest. The user enters the air shower via the entrance door. At the end of the air shower cycle, he leaves the exit door.
  • Or a user can enter the unit via the exit door, once the exit door closes the user can immediately leave via the  door without activation of the cycle. Both doors cannot be opened at the same time.

Two Way Operation:

  • In this mode, the cycle runs in both directions.
  • only one door at a time can be opened. The user can go in either direction and the air shower will cycle.

Test data has been obtained which prove that air showers are effective in reducing contamination brought into the cleanroom.

Data developed by a Japanese company several years ago indicates that, depending on the particle size, particle removal can be up to 90%. The larger particle the higher the efficiency.

airshower_0507043It is to be noted that proper operating protocol in using an air shower weighs greatly on its effectiveness. Training is of utmost importance to insure reduced contamination levels in cleanrooms and to ensure that the air shower is operating at maximum effectiveness. Proper protocol suggests personnel should be trained to rotate continuously 360 degrees, with hands on their heads, as shown during the air shower cycle to insure contamination removal is as efficient as possible.

The Air Force has very exacting standards regarding acceptable levels of contamination while at the same time, has equally exacting standards when it comes to investing in equipment. In order to determine the efficacy of air showers the Air Force conducted tests of it own.

 

The test consisted of sending a team of twenty operating personnel through two air showers, one located before the entrance to the change room and the other before the entrance to the cleanroom itself with a cycle time of eight seconds each. operators were instructed to raise their arms and make a 360 degree turn. Prior to the entrance to the first shower, outer garments are removed and stored. Once passed the first air shower, the individual enters the change room where he puts on the cleanroom garments and goes through the second air shower, entering the cleanroom. After each test condition, the cleanroom was allowed to return to normal contaminate level before a new test was begun and collections of samples were made.

chart

As can be seen, the level of contamination removal was at least 44% with at least one air shower in operation. With two air showers in operation, contamination removal was 80%.

Further independent testing on the type of material workers are clothed in demonstrates that what the worker wears can make a significant difference in the amount of particulate removed by the air shower as indicatd in the chart below:
particle_rem_13082

Today’s Air Showers can keep a significant amount of residual contamination from entering a cleanroom workplace as long as certain criteria are met:

  1. The air shower must be properly designed and sized to maintain effective and efficient operations
  2. At a minimum, HEPA filters are 99.99% efficient at 0.3 microns or optional ULPA filter at 99.999% efficient at 0.12 microns
  3. Sufficient “wash down time” – at least 45 seconds – must be allowed in the air shower
  4. The air supplied to the shower must be finely filtered to prevent personnel  from being impinged with contaminants during the actual cleaning cycle
  5. A fixed nozzle pattern must be followed and the nozzles must be preset to direct air in a downward flow to produce a shearing, wash down effect.  It is essential to have a fluttering of garments strong enough to loosen dust.
  6. The garments themselves must be made of material such as Tyvek, teflon, dacron, or nylon that is less likely to shed than cloth; comfort and cost must not be the determining factor
  7. The air shower must operate at a negative pressure. In other words, the pressure in the air shower must not exceed the pressure outside. The pressure must be less than the cleanroom side to prevent contaminates
  8. Very importantly, personnel must act responsibly, i.e., when they stand off-center or crouch in a corner to avoid the air flow, they are defeatign the whole purpose of the air shower. The individual must center himself in the shower and execute several complete 360 degree turns during the 45 second duration of the air shower, with hands positioned over the head.
  9. The individual must remain in the air shower for several moments as specified in the company’s protocol after it has stopped to allow enough “purge time” or “dwell time” so that the particles may drift downward throught the floor grate and are not drawn into the cleanroom by the movement of the individual as he leaves the air shower
  10. Air showers, like cleanrooms, or for that matter any process equipment, must be properly maintained in order to function properly. Lack of proper maintance can become a major sorce of contamination.

__________________________________________________________

Production Automation is a proud distributor of Liberty Air Showers with many options to suit your particular needs and requirements. From stainless steel and High/Low Volume showers, to custom projects.

Beacuse of the many varients that go into pricing these air showers, please contact us if you are interested in purchasing a Liberty Air Shower and we will be more than happy to work with you to find the exact product you need at the best pricing.

We can be contacted via email at info@gotopac.com , or you can call us monday through friday at 888-903-0333, or a third option would be to follow the request quote link on the right hand side of our blog.


Production Automation Electronics Promotions

March 18, 2009

Production Automation has specials running on four different product lines. Some of them have been blogged about here already and some have not.

We wanted to recap all of the specials because some of them end March 31st, while others are running longer.

Hakko Soldering Products

Silver Lining ‘09

Hakko’s Silver Lining ‘09 is celebrating Hakko’s 25th year in the industry. From now until March 31st, Hakko is offering 25% off of 25 different Hakko products:

  • FM203-01 Dual Port Soldering Station
  • FM203-DP Dual Port Soldering Station
  • FX951-66 Compact Soldering Station
  • FX301B-03 Digital Soldering Pot
  • FX300-03 Analog Soldering Pot
  • FX780-01 Table Top Nitrogen Generator
  • FM2026-KIT Nitrogen Controller
  • FM204-01 Desoldering Station
  • FM204-CP Desoldering/Soldering Station
  • FM205-01 Shop Air Desoldering Station
  • FM2024-21 Desoldering Module
  • FM2022-05 Parallel Remover
  • FM2023-05 Mini Hot Tweezer
  • FR801-11 SMD Hot Air Rework Station
  • FR802-11 SMD Hot Air Rework Station
  • FR803B-11 SMD Hot Air Rework Station
  • FR820-02 Preheater
  • FR1012B-01 Preheater
  • FT700-05 Tip Cleaner
  • FG100-01 Celsius Thermometer
  • FG100-02 Fahrenheit Thermometer
  • FG101-10 Fahrenheit Tester
  • FG101-16 Celsius Tester
  • FT800-01 Thermal Wire Stripper
  • HJ3100 Fume Extraction System
  • Free Shipping on Hakko’s 936-12 Station

    The 936 soldering station is an inexpensive, temperature adjustable station that you can stack to conserve valuable bench space. ESD safe by design.

  • Adjustable temperature control with lock/set screw
  • Temperature range 200°C – 480°C (392°F – 896°F)
  • Maintains idle temperature within 1°C (1.8°F)
  • Ceramic heating element and sensor ensures rapid heat-up temperature (30 seconds) and lightning-fast thermal recovery
  • Celsius or Fahrenheit temperature setting
  • Temperature adjusted by simply turning the dial
  • Slender iron handles are insulated and ergonomic-designed for ease and comfort
  • Accommodates large, medium, or small irons
  • Wide selection of tips available for soldering SMD and through-hole connections
  • Hakko sale pricing ends March 31st

    Brady Printers & Labels

    Brady is giving away free handheld label printers until March 31st.

    HandiMark Handheld Color Printer

    Simply place your order with a quantity of 12 or more cartridges and you will automatically receive a printer. That is a savings of $775!

    HandiMark Version 3.0 Printer Gives You The Power To Create Custom Labels Anytime, Anywhere.
    The latest release of the HandiMark® Portable Label Maker offers 30% faster printing speed, with additional upgrades that increase functionality and efficiency, such as auto recall, sleep mode and a clearer graphical display. The Brady HandiMark printer is ideal for creating highly visible labels in facilities like mechanical maintenance facilities, production and operations, warehouses and storerooms, and laboratories. This full-featured printer offers bold, easy to read text from 0.08″ to 1.7″, bar coding capabilities, 12 resident operating languages, alpha-numeric sequencing, and PC compatibility. HandiMark also incorporates a variety of stock industrial-grade label materials and specialty tapes.

    TLS 2200 Handheld Thermal Printer

    Simply place your order with a quantity of 15 or more cartridges and you will automatically receive a printer. That is a savings of $775!

    The TLS 2200®is a light weight (2.75 lb/1.25 kg) portable printer packed with features to make identifying your structured cabling environment a snap. This thermal transfer printer delivers crisp, clear, non-smearing labels every time and its smart cell technology guaranties ease of use. Just drop the labels in and print. The TLS 2200® will automatically serialize, and can also print two copies of each serialized label – one for each end of the run. Features include memory for label storage, banner printing, and PC connectivity. More than 500 different labels are available to fit all your identification needs.

    Brady Free Printer Specials end March 31st

    ASG Hand Tools

    ASG is a leading supplier of products for light assembly. They have an extensive product line, and 20 years experience in the industry. From now until June 1st they are offering you two great deals!

    Free Power Supply with purchase of TL Driver

    Choose from one of four TL drivers and automatically receive a PS-55 power supply FREE!

    Save 20% on ASG Easy Order Kits

    These kits save you time and money, bundling everything you need to get the job done! All Kits include: Tool Support Stand, Tool Positioner, and PS-55 Power Supply.

    ASG Specials end June 1st

    OC White Magnifiers & Microscopes

    OC White products are manufactured with the highest degree of quality and dependability. From now until April 30th they are offering savings and a FREE Big Eye Magnifier.

    Free Big Eye Magnifier with Purchase of a  Stero-Zoom Microscope

    Purchase a TKSZ-LV2-BE  Prolite Stereo-Zoom 4.5 Package with LED Ring Light and receive a  free Big Eye Magnifier automatically.

    This Prolite TKSZ-LV2-BE ESD-Safe stereo-zoom microscope provides clear, crisp images, excellent focal depth and 3 dimensional viewing with a quick turn of the zoom knob. The prolite Stereo Zoom 4.5 series is the ultimate combination of quality, performance, and value:

  • 3.5-45x magnification range standard
  • Excellent large 22mm eyepieces (with Eyeguards)
  • .5 Aux. lens included standard for increased working distance
  • Metal body for ESD safety
  • High output ESD safe LED Ring Illuminator
  • Save 20% on a Large 7″ x 5.75″ Dual-Mag DMLC Series Magnifier

    Prolite® DMLC Dual-Mag Magnifier; 3 (1.75X) Diopter; EZ Swivel Arm; 7.0″ x 5.75″ Viewing Area

  • 3 Diopter (1.75x) Optical Quality Lens – 7.0″ x 5.75″ Viewing Area
  • FREE 10 Diopter “Swing-A-Way” Lens Included
  • NEW 13 Watt DUAL Glare Free “Full Spectrum” Bulbs
  • Independent Bulb control with Vented Bulb Shields
  • OC White specials end April 30th

     

    If you have any questions about any of these specials or any of the products featured in this blog you can contact Production Automation anytime:

    Web: www.gotopac.com

    Email: info@gotopac.com


    Now Available: ASG Easy Order Kits

    March 13, 2009

    Production Automation has added easy order kits to our ASG Hand Tools category. We want to make buying ASG simple and convenient, now we have seven different kits ready for purchase without having to pick and choose across different ASG categories.

    These kits are also on sale until June 1st!

    ASG is offering great deals on the Kits:

    Purchase any of the HIOS Starter Kits and receive and automatic 20% savings. All kits include:

    Tool Support Stand
    Prevents tool from falling off the bench, protecting your investment. Keeps cords out of the operator’s way and is made of extra strong materials for long life.

  • Most versatile tool stand
  • Adjusts both vertically and horizontally in any direction (full 360° rotation)
  • Height and swing can be locked in any position
  • Tool Positioner

  • Weight Capacity: 5lbs.
  • Cord Length: 55″
  • Reduce operator fatigue
  • PS-55 Power Source for Precision Low Voltage Electric Drivers

  • Switchable two-speed output delivers a full 30 VDC on “high” setting – extra voltage when needed for optimal performance
  • Standard clutch signal output: can be used with counters or programmable logic controllers to monitor driver (Not suitable for use with ASG TS Series or Smart Torq™ process monitoring equipment)
  • Can be used with either 110 or 220 VAC input via external switch
  • Removable AC power cord is easily replaced if damaged
  • For single tool use
  • And the HIOS Starter Kit Driver Options are:

    CL-4000 DC Electric Medium Size – Inline

  • Medium to Light Torque Applications
  • #0 to #4 screws (1.4mm to 3.0mm)
  • Alpha-Series (A Series) feature a rare earth magnet motor for more power
  • 4.0mm Drive Model offers greatest flexibility for small fasteners or vacuum pick-up applications
  • CL-6500 DC Electric Standard Size Driver – Pistol Grip

  • Standard to Medium Horizontal Applications
  • #1 to #8 screws (2.0mm to 4.0mm)
  • Tamper-Resistant Torque Nut Standard
  • Trigger Start
  • 6′ Attached Cord
  • BL-5000 Brushless DC Electric Driver: Medium size – Inline

  • Medium to light torque applications
  • #1 to #4 screws (2.0mm to 3.0mm)
  • 4.0mm drive model offers greatest flexibility for small fasteners or vacuum pick-up applications
  • Driver is switchable between lever start and push-to-start
  • Oval shape for reduced fatigue
  • We are also offering a TL Series Tool bundled with a PS-55 Power source.

    Until June 1st receive the Power Source FREE! All TL Series Kits include:

    PS-55 Power Source for Precision Low Voltage Electric Drivers

  • Switchable two-speed output delivers a full 30 VDC on “high” setting – extra voltage when needed for optimal performance
  • Standard clutch signal output: can be used with counters or programmable logic controllers to monitor driver (Not suitable for use with ASG TS Series or Smart Torq™ process monitoring equipment)
  • Can be used with either 110 or 220 VAC input via external switch
  • Removable AC power cord is easily replaced if damaged
  • For single tool use
  • TL Series Driver Options Include:

    TL-3000 Precision Torque DC Driver

  • Automatically stop when pre-set torque is reached
  • Balanced ergonomic design
  • Exceptionally lightweight: 11.5 oz
  • Reduced vibration and noise
  • Low voltage DC operation
  • Double-insulated
  • TL-6500 Precision Torque DC Driver

  • Automatically stop when pre-set torque is reached
  • Balanced ergonomic design
  • Exceptionally lightweight: 11.5 oz
  • Reduced vibration and noise
  • Low voltage DC operation
  • Double-insulated
  • Both TL Drivers are available in an ESD Version

    (TL-3000 ESD & TL-6500 ESD)

    These Kits will be available on Production Automation’s website permanently, but the special pricing only lasts until June 1st, so be sure to take advantage of the savings!


    Hakko Soldering Products Now Available at PAC

    March 12, 2009

    Production Automation is excited to announce we are now full distributors of Hakko Brand soldering equipment!

    hakko_logoWe have just finished work on our new section of Hakko Soldering, and invite you to come take a look at all the excellent products we have available.

    Before March, we only offered the Hakko 936-12 soldering station but we can now offer all of the Hakko Soldering Stations, Desoldering Stations, Rework/Hot Air Stations, Direct Plug Soldering Irons, Solder Pots, Fume ExtractionTips, and all Hakko Accessories!

    And, for a limited time only Hakko is offering their “Silver Lining ‘09″ special to celebrate their 25th year in the industry!

    Buy three, get one FREE on 25 different Hakko Brand products

    sl_title-header

    To view all 25 Hakko products eligible click here:

    Silver Lining 09

    The details are simple, Purchase three (3) products (products must be the same part number) and receive a 4th product directly from Hakko for FREE. That’s a 25% savings!

    There is NO LIMIT to the number of stations you can receive!

    This special won’t last forever, so visit Production Automation today and take advantage of Hakko’s great offer!


    Fundamentals of Electrostatic Discharge, Part 6

    March 12, 2009

    Part 6: ESD Standards

    2001, ESD Association, Rome NY

    The electronics industry is continually shifting. Device density and technology is more complex. Electronics manufacturing is more heavily reliant on out-sourcing. The ESD industry seems to have jumped into this swirling eddy headfirst. ESD control programs have mushroomed. Black has been replaced by green, blue, and gold. Shielding bags dominate the warehouse. Ionizers exist along side wrist straps, and ground cords. An early history of “smoke and mirrors”, magic and lofty claims of performance is rapidly and safely being relegated to the past.

    Today, more than ever, meeting the complex challenge of reducing ESD losses requires more than reliance on faith alone. Users require a way to legitimately evaluate and compare competing brands and types of products. They need objective confirmation that their ESD control program provides effective solutions to their unique ESD problems. Contract manufacturers and OEM’s require mutually agreed-upon ESD control programs that reduce duplication of process controls.

    That’s where standards come into play. They provide guidance in developing programs that effectively address ESD process control. They help define the sensitivity of the products manufactured and used. They help define the performance requirements for various ESD control materials, instruments and tools. Standards are playing an ever-increasing role in reducing marketplace confusion in the manufacture, evaluation, and selection of ESD control products and programs.

    The Who and Why of Standards

    Who uses ESD Standards? Manufacturers and users of ESD sensitive devices and products, manufacturers and distributors of ESD control products, certification registrars, and third party testers of ESD control products.

    Why use ESD Standards? They help assure consistency of ESD sensitive products and consistency of ESD control products and services. They provide a means of objective evaluation and comparison among competitive ESD control products. They help in developing, implementing, auditing, and certifying ESD control programs. And, they help reduce confusion in the marketplace.

    In the United States, the use of standards in voluntary, although their use can be written into contracts or purchasing agreements between buyer and seller. In most of the rest of the world, the use of standards, where they exist, is compulsory.

    Key Standards and Organizations

    Just 20 years ago, there were relatively few reliable ESD standards and few ESD standards development organizations. Today’s ESD standards landscape is not only witnessing an increase int he number of standards, but also increasing cooperation among the organizations that develop them.

    Today’s standards fall into three main groups. First, there are those that provide ESD program guidance or requirements. These include documents such as ANSI ESD S20.20-1999–Standard of the Development of an ESD Control Program, ANSI/ESD S8.1-ESD Awareness Symbols, or ESD TR20.20 ESD Handbook.

    A second group covers requirements for specific products or procedures such as packaging or grounding. Typical standards in this group are ANSI/ESD S6.1- Grounding or ESD S11.11 for Shielding Bags.

    A third group of documents covers the standardized test methods used to evaluate products and materials. Historically, the electronics industry relied heavily on test methods established for other industries or even other materials (e.g., ASTM-257-DC Resistance or Conductance of Insulating Materials). Today, however, specific test method standards focus on ESD in the electronics environment, largely as a result of the ESDAssociation’s activity. These include standards such as ESD S5.1- Device Testing, Human Body Model and ANSI/ESD S7.1: Floor Materials — Resistive Characterization to cite just a few.

    Who Develops Standards?

    Standards development and usage is a cooperative effort among all organizations and individuals affected by standards. There are several key ESD standards development organizations.

    Military Standards

    Traditionally, the U.S. Military spearheaded the development of specific standards and specifications with regard to ESD control in the U.S. today, however, U.S. Military agencies are taking a less proactive approach, relying on commercially developed standards rather than developing standards themselves. For example, the ESD Association completed the assignment from the Department of Defense to convert MIL-STD-1686into a commerical standard.

    ESD Association

    The ESD Association has been a focal point for the development of ESD standards in recent years. An ANSI-accredited standards development organization, the Association is charged with the development of ESD standards and test methods. The Association also represents the US on the International Electrotechnical Commission Technical Committee 101-Electrostatics.

    The ESD Association has published 26 standards documents  and 9 technical reports. These voluntary standards cover the areas of material requirements, electrostatic sensitivity, and test methodology for evaluating ESD control materials and products. In addition to standards documents, the Association also publishes a number of informational advisories.

    ESD Association Standards Classifications and Definitions

    There are four types of ESD Association standards documents with specific clarity of definition. The four document categories are consistent with other standards development organizations. These four  categories are defined below.

    Standard: A precise statement of a set of requirements to be satisfied by a material, product, system or process that also specifies the procedures for determining whether each of the requirements is satisfied.

    Standard Test Method: A definitive procedure for the identification, measurement, and evaluation of one or more qualities, characteristics or properties of a material, product, system or process that yields a reproducible test result.

    Standard Practice: A procedure for performing one or more operations or functions that may or may not yield a test result. Note: If a test result is obtained, it may not be reproducible between labs.

    Technical Report: A collection of technical data or test results published as an informational reference on a specific material, product, system, or process.

    As new documents are approved and issued, they will be designated into one of these four new categories. Existing documents are being reviewed and will be reclassified as appropriate.

    International Standards

    The international  community, led by the European-based International Electrotechnical Commission, has also climbed on board the standards express. Europe’s CENELEC has issued a European electrostatic standard EN100015- Protection of Electrostatic Sensitive Devices that was adopted as a European Norm. Additional work by the IEC too will result in a comprehensive series of standards that may someday be the successor to EN100015.

    Japan also has released its proposed version of a national electrostatic Standard, which also shares the many aspects of the European and U.S. documents.

    Organizational Cooperation

    Perhaps one of the more intriguing changes in the ESD standards has been the organizational cooperation developing between various groups. One cooperative effort was between the ESD Association and the U.S. Department of Defense, which resulted in the Association preparing ANSI/ESD S20.20 as a successor to MIL-STD-1686.

    Internationally, European standards development organizations and the ESD Association have developed working relationships that result in an expanded review of proposed documents, greater imput, and closer harmonization of standards that impact the international electronics community.

    For users of ESD Standards, this increased cooperation will have a significant impact. First, we should see fewer conflicts between different standards. Finally, we should see less duplication of effort.

    Summary

    For the electronics community, the rapid propagation of ESD standards and continuing change in the standards environment mean greater availability of the technical references that will help improve ESD control programs. There will be recommendations to help set up effective programs. There will be test methods and specifications to help users of ESD control materials evaluate and select products that are applicable to their specific needs. And there will be guidelines for vendors of ESD products and materials to help them develop products that meet the real needs of their customers.

    Principle ESD Standards

    U.S. Military/Department of Defense

     MIL-STD-1686C: Electrostatic Discharge Control Program for Protection of Electrical and Electronic Parts, Assemblies and Equipment (Excluding Electrically Initiated Explosive Devices)

    This military standard establishes requirements for ESD Control Programs. It applies to U.S. military agencies, contractors, subcontractors, suppliers and vendors. It requires the establishment, implementation and documentation of ESDcontrol programs for static sensitive devices, but does NOT mandate or preclude the use of any specific ESD control materials, products, or procedures. It is being updated and converted to a commerical standard by the ESD Association. Although DOD has accepted the new ANSI/ESD S20.20 document as a successor, it has not yet taken action to cancel SRD-1686.

    MIL-HBDK-263B: Electrostatic Discharge Control Handbook for Protection of Electrical and Electronic Parts, Assemblies and Equipment (Excluding Electrically Initiated Explosive Devices)

    This Document provides guidance, but NOT mandatory requirements, for the establishment and implementation of an electrostatic discharge control program in accordance with the requirements of MIL-STD-1686

    MIL-PRF 87893-Workstation, Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) Control

    This document defines requirements for ESD protective workstations

    MIL-B-81705- Barrier Materials, Flexible, Electrostatic Protective, Heat Sealable

    This document defines the requirements for ESD protective flexible packaging materials

    MIL-STD-129-Marking for Shipment and Storage

    Covers procedures for marketing and labeling ESD sensitive items

    International/European

    EN100015: Protection of Electrostatic Sensitive Devices

    Adopted in 1992 and 1993, this European Norm covers ESD handling practices for electronic devices.

    ESD Association

    Standards Documents

    ESD S1.1-1998: Evaluation, Acceptance, and Functional Testing of Wrist Straps

    A successor to EOS/ESD S1.0, this document establishes test methods for evaluating the electrical and mechanical characteristics of wrist straps. It includes improved test methods and performance limits for evaluation, acceptance, and functional testing of wrist straps.

    ESD STM2.1-1997: Resistance Test Method for Electrostatic Discharge Protective Garments

    This Standard Test Method provides test methods for measuring the electrical resistance of garments used to control electrostatic discharge. It covers procedures for measuring sleeve-to-sleeve and point-to-point resistance.

    ESD STM3.1-2000: Ionization

    Test methods and procedures for evaluating and selecting air ionization equipment and systems are covered in this standard. The document establishes measurement techniques to determine ion balance and charge neutralization time for ionizers.

    ESD SP3.3-2000: Periodic Verification of Air Ionizers

    This Standard Practice provides test methods and procedures for periodic verification of the performance of air ionization equipment and systems (ionizers).

    ESD S4.1-1997 (Revised): Worksurfaces- Resistance Measurements

    This Standard establishes test methods for measuring the electrical resistance of worksurface materials used at workstations for protection of ESD susceptible items. It includes methods for evaluating and selecting materials, and testing new worksurface installations and previously installed worksurfaces.

    ESD STM4.2-1998: Worksurfaces- Charge Dissipation Characteristics

    This Standard Test Method provides a test method to measure the electrostatic charge dissipation characteristics of worksurfaces used for ESD control. The procedure is designed for use in a laboratory environment for qualification, evaluation or acceptance of worksurfaces.

    ESD STM5.1-1998 Revised: Electrostatic Discharge Sensitivity Testing– Human Body Model

    This Standard Test Method updates and revises an existing Standard. It establishes a procedure for testing, evaluating, and classifying the ESD sensitivity of components to the defined Human Body Model (HBM).

    ESD STM5.2-1999 (Revised): Electrostatic Discharge Sensitivity Testing– Machine Model

    This Standard establishes a test procedure for evaluating the ESD sensitivity of components to a defined Machine Model (MM). It also provides a system of classifying the sensitivity of these components. The component damage caused by the Machine Model is often similar to that caused by the Human Body Model, but it occurs at a significantly lower voltage.

    ESD STM5.3-1999: Electrostatic Discharge Sensitivity Testing- Charged Device Model–Non-Socketed Mode

    This Standard Test Method establishes a test method for evaluating the ESD sensitivity of active and passive components to a defines Charged Device Model (CDM).

    ESD S6.1-1999: Grounding– Recommended Practice

    This Standard recommends the parameters, procedures, and types of materials needed to establish an ESD grounding system for the protection of electronic hardware from ESD damage. This system is used for personnel grounding devices, worksurfaces, chairs, carts, floors, and other related equipment.

    ANSI ESD S7.1-1994: Floor Materials– Resistive Characterization of Materials

    Measurement of the electrical resistance of various floor materials such as floor coverings, mats, and floor finishes is covered in this document. It provides test methods for qualifying floor materials before installation or application and for evaluating and monitoring materials after installation or application.

    ANSI ESD S8.1-1993: ESD Awareness Symbols

    Three types of ESD awareness symbols are established by this document. The first one is to be used on a device or assembly to indicate that it is susceptible to electrostatic charge. The second is to be used on items and materials intended to provide electrostatic protection. The third symbol indicates the common point ground.

    ESD S9.1-1995: Resistive Characterization of Footwear

    This Standard defines a test method for measuring the electrical resistance of shoes used for ESD control in the electronics environment.

    ESD SP10.1-2000: Automated Handling Equipment

    This Standard Practice provides procedures for evaluating the electrostatic environment associated with automated handling equipment.

    ANSI ESD 11.11-1993: Surface Resistance Measurement of Static Dissipative Planar Materials

    This Standard Test Method provides test methods for measuring the volume resistance of static dissipative planar materials used in the packaging of ESD sensitive devices and components.

    ANSI ESD S11.31-1994: Evaluating the Performance of Electrostatic Discharge Shielding Bags

    This Standard provides a method for testing and determining the shielding capabilities of electrostatic shielding bags.

    ESD STM12.1-1997: Seating- Resistive Characterization

    This Standard provides test methods for measuring the electrical resistance of seating used to control ESD. The test method can be used for qualification testing as well as for evaluating and monitoring seating after installation. It covers all types of seating, including chairs and stools.

    ESD STM13.1-2000: Electrical Soldering/Desoldering Hand Tools

    This Standard Test Method provides electric soldering/desoldering hand tool test methods for measuring the electrical leakage and tip to ground reference point resistance and provides parameters for EOS safe soldering operation.

    ANSI ESD S20.20-1999: Standard for the Development of an ESD Control Program

    This Standard provides administrative, technical requirements and guidance for establishing, implementing and maintaining an ESD Control Program.

    ESD STM97.1-1999: Floor Materials and Footwear- Resistance in Combination with a Person.

    This Standard Test Method provides for measuring the electrostatic voltage on a person in combination with floor materials and footwear, as a system.

    Advisory Documents 

    Advisory Documents and Technical Reports are not Standards, but provide general information for the industry or additional information to aid in better understanding of Association Standards.

    ESD ADV1.0-1994: Glossary of Terms

    Definitions and explanations of various terms used in Association Standards and documents are covered in this advisory. It also includes other terms commonly used in the ESD industry.

    ESD ADV3.2-1995: Selection and Acceptance of Air Ionizers

    This Advisory document provides end users with guidelines for creating a performance specification for selecting air ionization systems. It reviews four types of air ionizers and discusses applications, test method references, and general design, performance and safety requirements.

    ESD ADV11.2-1995: Triboelectric Charge Accumulation Testing

    The complex phenomenon of triboelectric charging is discussed in this Advisory. it covers the theory and effects of tribocharging. It reviews procedures and problems associated with various test methods that are often used to evaluate triboelectrification characteristics. The test methods reviewed indicate gross levels of charge and polarity, but are not necessarily repeatable in real world situations.

    ESD ADV53.1-1995: Triboelectric Charge Accumulation Testing

    This Advisory document defines the minimum requirements for a basic ESD protective workstation used in ESD sensitive areas. It provides a test method for evaluating and monitoring workstations. It defines workstations as having the following components: support structure, static dissipative worksurface, a means of grounding personnel, and any attached shelving or drawers.

    ESD TR20.20: ESD Handbook

    New handbook provides detailed guidance for implementing an ESD control program in accordance with ANSI/ESD S20.20.

    Sources of Standards

    ESD Association, 7900 Turin Road, Building 3, Rome, NY 13440. Phone: 315-339-6937 Fax: 315-339-6793 Web: www.esda.org

    HIS Global Engineering Documents, 15 Inverness Way East, Englewood CO 80112. Phone: 800-854-7179 Fax: 303-397-2740 Web: http://global.ihs.com

    International Electrotechnical Commission, 3, Rue de Varembe, Case postale 131, 1211 Geneva 20, Switzerland. Fax: 41-22-919-0300 Web: http://www/iec.ch/

    Military Standards, Navel Publications and Forms Center, 5801 Tabor Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19120.

     

    _______________________________________________________

    Visit Production Automation and view our entire section of Static Control Materials

     


    Fundamentals of Electrostatic Discharge, Part 5

    March 6, 2009

    Part 5: Device Sensitivity and Testing

    ESD Association, Rome NY

     In Part Twoof this series, we indicated that a key element in a successful static control program was the identification of those items (components, assemblies, and finished products) that are sensitive to ESD and the level of their sensitivity. Damage to an ESDS device by the ESD event is determined by the device’s ability to dissipate the energy of the discharge or withstand the current levels involved. This is known as device “ESD sensitivity” or “ESD susceptibility”.

    Some devices may be more readily damaged by discharges occurring within automated equipment, while others may be more prone to damage from handling by personnel. In this article we will cove rthe models and test procedures used to characterize, determine, and classify the sensitivity of components to ESD. These test procedures are based on the three primary models of ESD events: Human Body Model (HBM), Machine Model (MM), and Charged Device Model (CDM). The models used to perform component testing cannot replicate the full spectrum of all possible ESD events. Nevertheless, these models have been proven to be successful in reproducing over 95% of all ESD field failure signatures. With the use of standardized  test procedures, the industry can:

    • Develop and measure suitable on-chip protection
    • Enable comparisons to be made between devices
    • Provide a system of ESD sensitivity classification to assist in the ESD design and monitoring requirements of the manufacturing and assembly environments

    • Have documented test procedures to ensure reliable and repeatable results

    Human Body Model

    One of the most common causes of electrostatic damage is the direct transfer of electrostatic charge through a significant series resistor from the human body or from a charged material to the electrostatic discharge sensitive (ESDS) device. When one walks across a floor, an electrostatic charge accumulates on the body. Simple contact of a finger to the leads of an ESDS device or assembly allows the body to discharge, possibly causing device damage. The model used to simulate this event is the Human Body Model (HBM).

    The Human Body Model is the oldest and most commonly used model for classifying device sensitivity to ESD. The HBM testing model represents the discharge from the fingertip of a standing individual delivered to the device. It is modeled by a 100 pF capacitor discharged through a switching component and a 1.5kΩ series resistor into the component. This model, which dates from the nineteenth century, was developed for investigating explosions of gas mixtures in mines. It was adopted by the military in MIL-STD-883 Method 3015, and is also used in ESD Association standard ESD STM5.1: Electrostatic Discharge Sensitivity Testing– Human Body Model. A typical Human Body Model circuit is presented in Figure 1.

    5fig1

    Testing for HBM sensitivity is typically performed using automated test systems. The device is placed in the test system and contacted through a relay matrix. ESD zaps are applied and the post stress I-V current traces are reviewed to see if the devices fail. The ESD Association HBM test standard was recently revised to include several technical changes. First, the number of zaps has been reduced from one second to 300 milliseconds. The changes reduce the HBM qualification test time.

    The second technical change is a revision in the HBM tester specifications. The maximum rise time of an HBM wave form measured through a 500 ohm load was relaxed from 20 to 25 nanoseconds. This will allow HBM test equipment manufacturers to build high pin count testers that typically have a higher parasitic test board capacitance that slows down the 500 ohm wave form.

    Machine Model

    A discharge similar to the HBM event also can occur from a charged conductive object, such as a metallic tool or fixture. Originating in Japan as the result of trying to create a worse-case HBM event, the model is known as the Machine Model. This ESD model consists of a 200 pF capacitor discharged directly into a component with no series resistor.

    As a worst-case human body model, the Machine Model may be over severe. However, there are real-world situations that this model represents, for example the rapid discharge from a charged board assembly or from the charged cables of an automatic tester.

    Testing of devices for MM sensitivity using ESD Association standard ESD STM5.2: Electrostatic Discharge Sensitivity Testing–Machine Model is similar to HBM testing. The test equipment is the same, but the test head is slightly different. The MM version does not have a 1,500 ohm resistor, but otherwise the test board and the socket are the same as for HBM testing. The series inductance, as shown in Figure 2, is the dominating parasitic element that shapes the oscillating machine model wave form. The series inductance is indirectly defined through the specification of various waveform parameters.

    5fig2

    Charged Device Model Testing

    The transfer of charge froman ESDS device is also called an ESD event. A device may become charged, for example, from sliding down the feeder in an automated assembler. If it then contacts the insertion head or another conductive surface, a rapid discharge may occur from the device to the metal object. This event is known as the Charged Device Model (CDM) event and can be more destructive than the HBM for some devices. Although the duration of the discharge is very short–often less than one nanosecond– the peak current can reach several tens of amperes.

    Several test methods have been explored to duplicate the real-world CDM event and provide a suitable test method that duplicates the types of failure that have been observed in CDM caused field failures. Current work in the area is concentrating on two separate CDM test methods. Once is termed CDM and best replicates the real world charged device event. The other addresses devices that are inserted in a socket and then charged and discharged in the socket. It is termed the Socketed Discharge Model (SDM). The device testing standard for CDM (ESD STM5.3.1: Electrostatic Discharge Sensitivity Testing- Charged Device Model)was published in 1999. The test procedure involves placing the device on a field plate with its leads pointing up, then charging it and discharging the device. Figure 3 illustrates a typical CDM test circuit.

    5fig3

    SDM testing is similar to testing for HBM and MM sensitivity. The device is placed in a socket, charged from a high voltage source and then discharged. This procedure is still a work in progress and has had to overcome a number of limitations including too great a dependency on the specific design of the SDM tester. A technical report, ESD TR08-00: Socket Device Model (SDM) Testeris also available from the ESD Association.

    Device Sensitivity Classification

    Each of the device testing methods includes a classification system for defining the component sensitivity to the specified model (See Tables 1, 2, and 3). These classification systems have a number of advantages. They allow easy grouping and comparing of components according to their ESD sensitivity and the classification gives you an indication of the level of ESD protection that is required for the component.

    5table1-2

    5table3

    A fully characterized component should be classified using all three models: Human Body Model, Machine Model, and Charged Device Model. For example, a fully characterized component may have the following: Class 1B (500 volts to <1000 volts HBM), Class M1 (<100 volts MM), and Class C3 (500 volts to <1000 volts CDM). This would alert a potential user of the component to the need for a controlled environment, whether assembly and manufacturing operations are performed by human beings or machines.

    A word of caution, however. These classification systems and component sensitivity test results function as guides, not necessarily as absolutes. The events defined by the test data produce narrowly restrictive data that must be carefully considered and judiciously used. The three ESD models represent discrete points used in an attempt to characterize ESD vulnerability. The data points are informative and useful, but to arbitrarily extrapolate the data into a real world scenario can be misleading. The true utility of the data is in comparing one device with another and to provide a starting point for developing your ESD control programs.

    Summary

    Device failure models and device test methods define the sensitivity of the electronic devices and assemblies to be protected from the effects of ESD. With this key information, you can design more effective ESD control programs.

    _______________________________________________

    Production Automationoffers a wide range of ESD control products, you can view our Static Control category here: Static Control at PAC